Wednesday, December 16, 2009
hi! quick update
As the nature of my art nudes work has become more daring, I will be deleting my facebook fan page and probably moving my blog to a different blogspot address to maintain to privacy from family, conservative friends and my styling work relationships. If you want a link to where you can keep tabs of the nature of this work, please send me a message at nakedfashionstylist(at)gmail.com and yeh shall receive :)
The above photo of me was shot by Simon Productions.
Thursday, November 26, 2009
flash~~back
Sunday, November 22, 2009
As I took the magazines, the pair of stockings and the tub of icecream from him, I half jokingly said, "You're spoiling me."
Photo by www.frankaugust.com
"Believe me, I would love to spoil the shit out of you," he muttered in reply somewhat under his breath without even looking at me, he emphasized both love and shit.
My stomach hurt, like it had been hit.
He walked out into the kitchen, he walked like I then believed a man should walk, slow with resolve.
Shortly therefater, I decided I should probably leave.
I was grateful to him for something I couldn't really place and expressed the gratitude by lingering too long after I said my goodbye.
Slightly abashed, I got a feeling my awkwardness appealed to him.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Channeling Paloma Picasso
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Ok, so I'm no photographer...
but through this "naked project" of mine I have encountered a few very new photographers who have just purchased their 1st real camera and are anxious to have DNA, Women and other such model agencies banging on their door in "East" Williamsburg.
Often these guys share with me their woeful tales of "having" to shoot "ugly" models.
I have been a professional fashion stylist for 8 years I have also art-directed and produced shoots. Thus from experiences, I feel I can offer my humble opinion on the subject:
When seeing a photo of a model or her comp card, before choosing her make sure she you have some feeling of inspiration from her image, after which you should meet her in person (a go-see) to make sure her photos are representative of who she is (like, she hasnt aged by a decade or gained 20lb, etc). Also and very importantly, you must watch for a good rapport with her or try an establish one if she's difficult or shy...or foreigh who speaks 3 English words. Also at the meet go through every image in her portfolio, look at the natural unretouched ones carefully, study why those photos worked, what is his/her best angle, feature, most natural way of posing etc. Use this research as a way to save yourself time so you don't have to reinvent the wheel every time you shoot someone new, have ideas of how you will shoot them before you start.
When it comes to "testing" where you are sent someone new from an agency (or no agency) who is too new to have any pics you can study and or you notice that during the shoot the pics are coming out just terrible, try taking a break and investing a good hour talking with her, having her relax, drinking tea or wine (if she's of age) or whatever- try to see what her lover would see in her, take snapshots as you speak...
This works very well for character portraits especially.
Don't have her do weird fashion poses if its not her, use her style. As a photographer, your camera is the eye to her inner beauty and it is your job to bring it out. Of course its easier and GREAT if in comes a 6 foot photogenic beauty who knows how to move and emote and has a great personality and whose skin you barely have to touch in photoshop, but on the flip where's the challenge in that? = )
The above Polaroids were taken by Frank of www.frankaugust.com, as I danced to gypsy music!
Frank is so adapt at drawing out (the best of) your characater that it's incredibly easy and a high to pose for this gentleman of a photographer. The site I linked is his personal projects work, but he is also a well seasoned photographer with a polished editorial and commercial portfolio under his belt. But what a dynamic individual! Aside his charm and easygoing nature, there is a serenity yet wildness about him (as if he were a 60 year old sage and at the same time a 12 year old boy). Bigg kiss to Frank, xoxo!
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Shoot me nude, shoot me lewd
My last post kept me thinking about the distinction between pornographic versus art nudes. I became overwhelmed realizing there is much in between, I began to think of it as a spectrum, pornographic photography being on one end and art nudes photography on the other, with erotica and glamour somewhere in the middle.
Certainly all of the above styles of have spectrums within themselves, for the sake of my sainity I'm only focusing my opnions on the four aforementioned categories. I might sound a little pedantic, you must forgive me!
Pornographic photography uses the depiction of the body and its sexual mechanisms as a tool to intetionally evoke sexual arousal from the viewer.
Erotic photography is not sexually explicit as pornographic. It is charged with sexual suggestion while leaving the explicity to the viewer's imagination.
Glamour photography is a very airbrushed style of photography depicting women with flat tummies and curvy breasts, shiny hair, bright teeth, glowing skin and seductive Mona-Lisa smiles usually clad in a bikinni or implying nudity (covering of the breasts with an arm for example). This style promotes the viewers' fantasy of the "perfect" woman (think Maxim style covers).
Art nude or figure nude photography uses the body the way a landscape photographer uses the landscape to capture interesting composition, form, texture, lines and and angles. The body is used almost inanimately.
Ironically, the photography styles at the opposite ends of this spectrum, pornographic and art nude, have one very common ground, both objectify the body.
In my opinion the above image of me would be a mixture of erotica and an art nude. As erotica, it suggests sex and has me tease the viewer with the placement of my hand, it also utilizes a bit of sexually suggestive apparel (note my self styling :). This image can also be argued as an art nude, because art nudes do not engage the subject's face or do not even use it alltogether, my body becomes simply about the the lines.
This photo was taken by a photographer who goes by Gus.
You may view some samples of Gus' other photography here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/42670484@N05/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)